Primary Care Diabetes
Volume 1, Issue 2 , Pages 69-74, June 2007

Screen detected subjects with type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance have more adverse cardiovascular risk than subjects with impaired fasting glucose especially when they are obese:

The ADDITION Netherlands study

  • Paul G.H. Janssen

      Affiliations

    • Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, PO Box 85060, 3508 AB Utrecht, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 30 2538251; fax: +31 30 2539028.
  • ,
  • Kees J. Gorter

      Affiliations

    • Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Ronald P. Stolk

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Guy E.H.M. Rutten

      Affiliations

    • Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Received 4 December 2006; received in revised form 17 February 2007; accepted 19 February 2007. published online 02 April 2007.

Abstract 

Aims

To determine cardiovascular risk of screen detected subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG). To examine whether BMI is an effect modifier regarding the relation between level of glucose regulation and cardiovascular risk factors.

Methods

From 2002 to 2003, 29,251 persons, aged 50–70 years, participated in a population-based diabetes screening programme. Diagnosis was based on the 1999 WHO criteria. Characteristics were assessed of 285 subjects with T2DM, 175 with IGT and 218 with IFG.

Results

IFG did not resemble IGT and T2DM regarding weight and blood pressure. BMI (kg/m2) was 27.3±4.4, 29.5±5.7, 30.7±5.6 in IFG, IGT, DM, respectively; systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 150±25, 161±24, 162±23; diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 84±12, 89±12, 90±11. The poorer the glycaemic control, the worse levels of BMI, blood pressure and lipids.

When BMI was higher, cardiovascular risk factors were more adverse, especially in subjects with diabetes.

Conclusions

Subjects with IFG had lower blood pressure and weight than subjects with IGT and T2DM suggesting IFG is a condition with less risk to develop cardiovascular diseases. Effect modification by BMI was found.

Abbreviations: CVD, cardiovascular diseases, FBG, fasting blood glucose, FPG, fasting plasma glucose, IFG, impaired fasting glucose, IGT, impaired glucose tolerance, OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test, RBG, random blood glucose, WHO, World Health Organization, 2-h PG, two-hour plasma glucose

Keywords: Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Impaired glucose tolerance, Impaired fasting glucose

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1751-9918(07)00032-0

doi:10.1016/j.pcd.2007.02.001

Primary Care Diabetes
Volume 1, Issue 2 , Pages 69-74, June 2007