Primary Care Diabetes
Volume 1, Issue 2 , Pages 107-110, June 2007

The quality dilemma

Radboud University Nijmegen, Department of General Practice, PO Box 9101, afd 117, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Received 13 March 2007; accepted 25 March 2007. published online 10 May 2007.

Abstract 

In the language and logic of the free market, providers of health care will have to demonstrate the quality of their work. However, in this setting quality is only interpreted in quantitative ways and consequently does not necessarily do justice to good physicians. Moreover, both outcome measures and process measures have serious drawbacks. An emphasis on outcome measures will disadvantage physicians working in deprived areas and doctors managing more complicated cases. Although process measures give the most direct information on the physician's performance, their evidence base is not always as straightforward as commonly supposed. Finally, measurement of quality indicators is complicated and time consuming. Physicians should be aware of the drawbacks of quality measurement and of the poor effects of quality improvement strategies on patient outcomes.

Keywords: Quality indicators, Process measures, Outcome measures

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1751-9918(07)00036-8

doi:10.1016/j.pcd.2007.03.001

Primary Care Diabetes
Volume 1, Issue 2 , Pages 107-110, June 2007

Article Tools