Primary Care Diabetes
Volume 2, Issue 1 , Pages 3-8 , 2008

Priorities for diabetes primary care in Europe

  • Van Eygen Luk

      Affiliations

    • Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Watervalstraat 62, 8850 Ardooie, Belgium. Tel.: +32 496100185; fax: +32 51747792.
  • ,
  • Sunaert Patricia

      Affiliations

    • Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • ,
  • Feyen Luc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • ,
  • Borgermans Liesbeth

      Affiliations

    • Department of Family Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • ,
  • De Maeseneer Jan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Received 2 May 2007 ,Revised 21 November 2007 ,Accepted 25 November 2007.

References 

  1. See www.euprimarycare.org (last accessed August 21, 2007).
  2. C. Mathieu, F. Nobels, G. Peeters, et al., Quality and Organisation of Type 2 Diabetes Care, Federaal kenniscentrum voor gezondheidszorg, Brussels, 2006, see www.centredexpertise.fgov.be.
  3. See www.futureofprimarycare.com (last accessed August 21, 2007).
  4. International Diabetes Federation, Diabetes Atlas, IDF, Brussels, 2003, see www.eatlas.idf.org.
  5. The DCCT Research Group, The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, N. Engl. J. Med. 329 (1993) 977–986.
  6. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group, Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33), Lancet 352 (1998) 837–853.
  7. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group, Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34), Lancet 352 (1998) 854–865.
  8. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group, Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 38), BMJ 317 (1998) 703–713.
  9. Vijan S, Hayward RA. Pharmacologic lipid-lowering therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus: background paper for the American College of Physicians. Ann. Intern. Med. 2004;140:650–658
  10. Campbell SM, Roland MO, Middleton E, et al. Improvements in quality of clinical care in English general practice 1998–2003: longitudinal observational study. BMJ. 2005;331:1121–1123
  11. GEDAPS, Results of the GEDAPS—Community of Valencia [in Spanish]. SVMFYC, Valencia, 2005, see www.svmfyc.org/Revista/05/originales.asp#top (accessed August 21, 2007).
  12. N. Debacker, F. Nobels, A. Scheen, et al., Initiative for quality assurance and epidemiology in diabetes [in Dutch], Wetenschappelijk Instituut Volksgezondheid, Brussels, 2005, IPH/EPI reports No. 2005-2, see www.iph.fgov.be (accessed August 21, 2007).
  13. Fagot-Campagna A, Simon D, Varroud-Vial M. Characteristics of treated diabetes patients and concurrence of medical care and official recommendations. Entred 2003. Bull. Epidémiol. Hebdomadaire. 2003;49–50:238–239
  14. U. Siering, F. Naundorf, Quality Monitoring Report 2004: Disease Management Programme Nordrhein [in German], Nordrheinische Gemeinsame Einrichtung Disease Management Programme GbR, Duesseldorf, 2004, see http://www.kvno.de/importiert/qualbe_dmp04.pdf (accessed August 22, 2007).
  15. Wagner EH. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve chronic care for chronic illness?. Effect Clin. Pract. 1998;1:2–4
  16. Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, Eriksson , et al. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. NEJM. 2001;344:1343–1350
  17. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group, Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin, NEJM 346 (2002) 393–403.
  18. International Diabetes Federation, Global guideline for type 2 diabetes, Brussels, IDF, 2005, see www.idf.org.
  19. T. Deakin, C.E. McShane, J.E. Cade, et al., Group-based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (4) 2004.
  20. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, Guidance on the use of patient-education models for diabetes, Technology Appraisal 60, London, 2006, see www.nice.org.uk.
  21. Norris SL, Engelgau MM, Narayan KM. Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:561–587
  22. Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, et al. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes care. 2002;25:1159–1171
  23. Funnell M, Brown T, Childs B, et al. National standards for diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1630–1637
  24. Schlögel R. Diabetes Mellitus—A Challenge for Health Policy. Vienna: Federal Ministry of Health and Women; 2006;
  25. Renders CM, Valk GD, Griffin S, et al. Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient and community settings. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2002;(4):
  26. Houweling ST. Task Delegation in Diabetes Primary and Secondary Care [in Dutch]. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; 2005;
  27. Wagner EH, Grothous LC, Sandhu N, et al. Chronic care clinics for diabetes in primary care. Diabetes Care. 2001;25:695–700
  28. E.D. Wagner, B. Austin, C. Coleman, It takes a region: creating a framework to improve chronic disease care, California Health Care Foundation, 2006, see http://www.chcf.org/topics/chronicdisease/index.cfm?itemID=127575 (accessed 30 September 2007).
  29. Varroud-Vial M, Charpentier G, Vaur L, et al. Effects of clinical audit on the quality of care in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of the DIABEST pilot study. Diabetes Metab. 2001;27:666–674
  30. Walker D, Harvey K. Outcomes managements of an ambulatory clinic system population: experience with patients with diabetes. J. Miss. State Med. Assoc. 2004;45:163–168
  31. Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2006;(2):
  32. Petersen LA, Woodard LD, Urech T, et al. Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care. Ann. Int. Med. 2006;145:265–272
  33. Lucassen P. The quality dilemma. PCD. 2007;1:107–110
  34. Hughes E. Payment by results—a model for other diabetes healthcare systems?. PCD. 2007;1:111–113
  35. Branger PJ, van’t Hooft A, van der Wouden JC, et al. Shared care for diabetes: supporting communication between primary and secondary care. Int. J. Med. Inform. 1999;53:133–142
  36. De Maeseneer JM, van Driel ML, Green LA, et van Weel C. The need for research in primary care. Lancet. 2003;362:1314–1319
  37. L. Van Eygen, L. Feyen, P. Sunaert, et al., Organisation of diabetes care: a descriptive study in 7 West-European countries, IDF abstract, Cape Town, 2006.
  38. Starfield B. New paradigms for quality in primary care. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2001;51:303–309
  39. S. Griffin, A.L. Kinmonth, Systems of routine surveillance for people with diabetes mellitus, Cochrane Library 2000/4.
  40. Shi L, Starfield B, Politzer R, Regan J. Primary care, self-rated health and reduction in social disparities in health. Health Serv. Res. 2002;37:529–550
  41. J. De Maeseneer, S. Willems, A. De Sutter et al. Primary health care as strategy for achieving equitable care, The Health Systems Knowledge Network, London, 2007. See http://www.wits.ac.za/chp/hskn.htm (accessed 7 November 2007).
  42. Finnish Diabetes Association, Programme for the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes in Finland, Helsinki, 2003.
  43. Houweling ST, Kleefste N, van Ballegooie E, et al. Shift of tasks in primary diabetes care [in Dutch]. Huisarts en Wetenschap. 2006;49:118–122
  44. NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre, Quality and outcomes framework information, see www.ics.nhs.uk/services/qof (accessed 10 November 2006).
  45. Kenny C. Diabetes and the quality and outcomes framework. BMJ. 2005;331:1097–1098

PII: S1751-9918(07)00169-6

doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2007.11.001

Primary Care Diabetes
Volume 2, Issue 1 , Pages 3-8 , 2008