Primary Care Diabetes
Volume 2, Issue 1 , Pages 31-37, 2008

Effects of the pharmacist's input on glycaemic control and cardiovascular risks in Muslim diabetes

  • Saowanee Phumipamorn

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacy, Nue-Klong Community Hospital, Krabi Province 81130, Thailand
  • ,
  • Juraporn Pongwecharak

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla 90112, Thailand
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +66 7 44288873; fax: +66 7 4428222.
  • ,
  • Suchada Soorapan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla 90112, Thailand
  • ,
  • Sutthiporn Pattharachayakul

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla 90112, Thailand

Received 9 July 2007; received in revised form 3 December 2007; accepted 7 December 2007. published online 29 January 2008.

Abstract 

Aims

To determine whether an extended pharmacy service would improve glycaemic control and cardiovascular risks in diabetic Muslims.

Methods

Ambulatory literate adult diabetic Muslims with A1C >7% were randomly assigned to either a study group (usual care plus added pharmacist input, N=63) or a control group (usual care only, N=67). On four consecutive visits, at 2-month intervals, the study group met a pharmacist who educated and discussed with each patient regarding medication uses and diabetic treatment. This was accompanied by providing a diabetic pamphlet. Changes in A1C (mg/dL), lipid parameters (mg/dL), medication adherence (% pill count) and diabetic knowledge scores were measured.

Results

There was no difference in A1C reduction between the study and the control groups (−0.8 vs. −0.6, p=0.56). Total cholesterol and LDL-C improvements were greater in the study group than in the control group (−31.6 vs. −1.2, p=0.000; −15.0 vs. +9.1, p=0.002, respectively). The percent pill count (+6.8 vs. −2.8, p=0.004) and diabetic knowledge scores (+2.1 vs. +0.6, p=0.002) were increased in the study group but not in the control group.

Conclusion

The pharmacist’ s one-on-one education on diabetes accompanied by its pamphlet, in Muslim patients with diabetes did not affect glycaemic outcome but reduction in cardiovascular risks through lowering total cholesterol and LDL-C was found. The strategies may also improve diabetic knowledge and medication adherence.

Keywords: Pharmacist, Education, Diabetes, Muslim, Cardiovascular risks, Glycaemic control, Lipid control, Medication adherence, Diabetic knowledge

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Part of this study was accepted as a poster presentation at the 3rd World Congress of the Board of Pharmaceutical Sciences of FIP (PSWC 2007) in Amsterdam, The Netherlands during 22–25 April 2007.

PII: S1751-9918(07)00180-5

doi:10.1016/j.pcd.2007.12.001

Primary Care Diabetes
Volume 2, Issue 1 , Pages 31-37, 2008