« Previous
Next »
Primary Care Diabetes
Volume 2, Issue 1
, Pages 9-16
, 2008
Initiating insulin in primary care—The role of modern premixed formulations
References
- . Intensive blood glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352:837–853
- . Clinical significance of targeting postprandial and fasting hyperglycemia in managing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2003;19:635–641
- Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year study. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 1995;28:103–117
- Psychosocial problems and barriers to improved diabetes management: results of the Cross-National Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) Study. Diabetes Med. 2005;22:1379–1385
- Resistance to insulin therapy among patients and providers. Results of the cross-national Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes, and Needs (DAWN) study. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2673–2679
- . When oral agents fail: practical barriers to starting insulin. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 2002;26(Suppl. 3):S18–S24
- . The use of premixed insulin analogues in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: advantages and limitations. Insulin. 2007;2:68–79
- . Trends and influences on use of antidiabetic drugs in England, 1992–2003. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2005;14:769–773
- Clinical inertia in response to inadequate glycemic control: do specialists differ from primary care physicians?. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:600–606
- Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1989;262:907–913Erratum in: JAMA 262 (18) (1989) 2542
- Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1992;267:1624–1630
- Outcomes of patients with hypertension and noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus treated by different systems and specialties: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1995;274:1436–1444
- . The future of primary care. The enhanced primary care model. J. Fam. Pract. 1998;47:62–67
- . Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness?. Eff. Clin. Pract. 1998;1:2–4
- . Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA. 2002;288:1775–1779
- National Coalition on Health Care, Institute for Health Improvement, Curing the system, www.improvingchroniccare.org/ACT_Report_May_2002_Curing_The_System.pdf.
- Supporting people with long-term conditions: An NHS and Social Care Model to support local innovation and integration, UK Department of Health, 2005 http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/idcplg?IdcService=GET_FILE&dID=4384&Rendition=Web.
- Health and Social Care Information Centre, Quality and Outcomes Framework, 2004/05, HSCIC, London, available at http://www.ic.nhs.uk/services/qof/data, 2005.
- J.N. Struijs, G.P. Westert, C.A. Baan, Effect evaluation of transmural diabetes care in the Netherlands, http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/260402001.html.
- . How workshops can support health staff helping patients move to insulin therapy. Prof. Nurse. 2004;19:26–28
- The Audit Commission review of diabetes services in England and Wales, 1998–2001. Diabetes Med. 2002;19:73–78
- Diabetes Service Provision in Primary Care: a baseline survey in a city Primary Care Trust (PCT). Pract. Diabetes Int. 2004;21:13–17
- Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. JAMA. 2002;288:475–482
- . Patient characteristics do not predict poor glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes patients treated in primary care. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2004;19:541–545
- Patient and provider perceptions of care for diabetes: results of the cross-national DAWN Study. Diabetologia. 2006;49:279–288
- . Insulin therapy in type II diabetes: who needs it, how much of it, and for how long?. Postgrad. Med. 1997;101:85–9092–94, 96
- . The loss of postprandial glycemic control precedes stepwise deterioration of fasting with worsening diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:263–269
- . Glucose tolerance and cardiovascular mortality: comparison of fasting and 2-hour diagnostic criteria. Arch. Intern. Med. 2001;161:397–405
- . Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a premixed formulation of soluble and protamine-retarded insulin aspart. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2000;56:399–403
- Neutral protamine lispro: activity profile of s.c. administration with and without admixture of soluble lispro. Diabetologia. 1996;39(Suppl. 1):A224;(Abstract)
- Nighttime insulin kinetics and glycemic control in type 1 diabetes patients following administration of an intermediate-acting lispro preparation. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:1870–1873
- . Injection-meal interval: recommendations of diabetologists and how patients handle it. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 1999;43:137–142
- . Combined therapy with insulin Lispro Mix 75/25 plus metformin or insulin glargine plus metformin: A 16-week, randomized, open-label, crossover study in patients with type 2 diabetes beginning insulin therapy. Clin. Ther. 2004;26:2034–2044
- . Initiating insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: a comparison of biphasic and basal insulin analogs. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:260–265
- Addition of biphasic, prandial, or basal insulin to oral therapy in type 2 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007;357(17):1716–1730
- . Contributions of fasting and postprandial plasma glucose increments to the overall diurnal hyperglycemia of type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:881–885
- Prandial insulin substitution with insulin lispro or insulin lispro mid mixture vs. basal therapy with insulin glargine: a randomized controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes beginning insulin therapy. J. Diabetes Complications. 2006;20:145–152
- Twice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 versus biphasic human insulin 30: a double-blind crossover study in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin. Ther. 2002;24:530–539
- Premixed insulin aspart 30 vs. premixed human insulin 30/70 twice daily: a randomized trial in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Med. 2002;19:393–399
- . Insulin aspart in a 30/70 premixed formulation. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:1612–1614
- Improved postprandial glycemic control with biphasic insulin aspart relative to biphasic insulin lispro and biphasic human insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:883–888
- Biphasic insulin aspart is associated with a reduced risk of hypoglycaemia compared with biphasic human insulin. Diabetologia. 2007;50(Suppl. 1):S408
- IDF Clinical Guidelines Task Force, Global guideline for type 2 diabetes, International Diabetes Federation, Brussels, 2005.
- . The role of the family physician in the diagnosis and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. J. Fam. Pract. 2006;(December (Suppl.)):5–9
- . Clinical inertia: overcoming a major barrier to diabetes management. Insulin. 2006;1:61–64
- . Medical guidelines for clinical practice for the management of diabetes mellitus. Endocr. Pract. 2007;13(Suppl. 1):1–68
- . The combined effect of triple therapy with rosiglitazone, metformin, and insulin aspart in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:3273–3279
- NovoMix dosing guidelines, http://www.novonordisk.com/images/diabetes/pdf/novomix_dosing_guidelines_60317.pdf.
- Attainment of glycaemic goals in type 2 diabetes with once-, twice-, or thrice-daily dosing with biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 (The 1–2–3 study). Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2006;8:58–66
- . Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in clinical reality: experience from a Dutch practice. Diabetes. 2007;56(Suppl. 1):A540
- . Improved postprandial glycemic control during treatment with Humalog Mix25, a novel protamine-based insulin lispro formulation. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:1258–1261
- . Is postprandial glucose a neglected cardiovascular risk factor in type 2 diabetes?. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 2000;30(Suppl. 2):3–11
- . Post-prandial hyperglycaemia: the necessity for better control. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2000;112:3–8
- . The emerging role of postprandial hyperglycaemic spikes in the pathogenesis of diabetic complications. Diabetes Med. 1998;15:188–193
- . Diabetes epidemiology: collaborative analysis of diagnostic criteria in Europe. Lancet. 1999;354:617–621
- . Prandial premixed insulin analogue regimens versus basal insulin analogue regimens in the management of type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based comparison. Clin. Ther. 2007;29(6P):1254–1270
- Reduced postprandial glycaemic excursion with biphasic insulin aspart 30 injected immediately before a meal. Diabetes Med. 2004;21:500–501
- . FlexPen: addressing issues of confidence and convenience in insulin delivery. Clin. Ther. 2005;27(Suppl. B):S89–S100
- . Options for insulin delivery and overcoming physician and patient concerns. J. Fam. Pract. 2006;(December (Suppl.)):18–24
- Randomized, multinational, open-label, 2-period, crossover comparison of biphasic insulin aspart 30 and biphasic insulin lispro 25 and pen devices in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin. Ther. 2004;26:531–540
- . A multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative, two-period crossover trial of preference, efficacy, and safety profiles of a prefilled, disposable pen and conventional vial/syringe for insulin injection in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin. Ther. 2003;25:2836–2848
- . Quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and treatment preference associated with use of a pen device delivering a premixed 70/30 insulin aspart suspension (aspart protamine suspension/soluble aspart) versus alternative treatment strategies. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2495–2497
- . Comparison of twice-daily aspart 70/30 (BIAsp 70/30) with once-daily insulin glargine (GLA) in patients with type 2 DM on oral antidiabetic agents. Diabetes. 2004;53(Suppl. 2):A143
PII: S1751-9918(08)00003-X
doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2008.01.005
© 2008 Primary Care Diabetes Europe. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Primary Care Diabetes
Volume 2, Issue 1
, Pages 9-16
, 2008
