Primary Care Diabetes
Volume 3, Issue 1 , Pages 17-21, February 2009

Vibration perception threshold and the law of mobility in diabetic mellitus patients

  • M. Manivannan

      Affiliations

    • Biomedical Engineering Group, Department of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India
    • These authors contributed equally to this work.
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • R. Periyasamy

      Affiliations

    • Biomedical Engineering Group, Department of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India
    • These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • ,
  • V.B. Narayanamurthy

      Affiliations

    • Diabetic Foot Clinic, Sundaram Medical Foundation, Chennai 600040, India
    • These authors contributed equally to this work.

Received 27 October 2007; received in revised form 7 August 2008; accepted 25 October 2008. published online 15 December 2008.

Abstract 

Background

Diabetic neuropathy is a family of nerve disorders with progressive loss of nerve function in 15% of diabetes mellitus (DM) subjects. Vibration Perception Threshold (VPT) is one of the modalities of testing loss of protective sensation. Law of mobility for VPT is well known for normal subjects, but not for diabetic subjects. This is a pilot study to evaluate and plot the law of mobility for VPT among DM subjects.

Methods

We used biothesiometer to find the VPT of several areas in upper and lower extremities for normal and diabetic subjects. VPT of normal and diabetic subjects for different foot areas from proximal to distal is evaluated for 30 subjects. All the subjects are screened for peripheral artery occlusive disease with ankle brachial pressure index (0.9 or above). VPT values of different areas are arranged in a proximal to distal order for the analysis.

Results

VPT values monotonically decrease from proximal to distal areas. Vierodt's law of mobility holds well for normal subjects in both feet areas. The law of mobility does not hold good for the DM subjects in one or both feet areas.

Conclusions

The VPT value of diabetic subjects reveals that the law of mobility do not holds good for diabetic subjects in foot areas. Though the number of subjects is small, all the subjects defied the law.

Keywords: Diabetic neuropathy, Mobility law, Verdotts's law, Two-point discrimination, Sensitivity test, Neuropathy test, Proximal to distal, Geometry law

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1751-9918(08)00106-X

doi:10.1016/j.pcd.2008.10.006

Primary Care Diabetes
Volume 3, Issue 1 , Pages 17-21, February 2009