Journal Home
Search for

Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages 211-217 (November 2009)


View previous. 5 of 14 View next.

Identification of persons with dysglycemia: Terminology and practical significance

David F. WilliamsonCorresponding Author Informationemail address, K.M. Venkat Narayan

Received 30 March 2009; received in revised form 18 August 2009; accepted 25 August 2009. published online 18 September 2009.

Abstract 

Allocating scarce resources for dysglycemia intervention requires identification of persons who will benefit. Identification has two steps: screening followed by diagnosis. Lowering a screening test's cut-off score identifies more persons with dysglycemia, but causes more normoglycemic persons to receive diagnostic testing. Raising a test's cut-off score reduces needless diagnostic testing, but increases the number falsely identified as not having dysglycemia. With limited budgets for intervention, raising a screening test's cut-off score may be appropriate. With ample budgets, lowering the test's cut-off score may be appropriate. Screening tests are most efficient in populations with high prevalence of dysglycemia.

KeywordsScreening, Diagnosis

Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd N.E., Room 740, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Tel.: +1 770 488 1054; fax: +1 770 488 8211.

PII: S1751-9918(09)00086-2

doi:10.1016/j.pcd.2009.08.006


View previous. 5 of 14 View next.