Primary Care Diabetes
Volume 4, Issue 1 , Pages 25-32, April 2010

Screening for the metabolic syndrome using simple anthropometric measurements in south Asian and white Europeans: A population-based screening study. The Leicester Ethnic Atherosclerosis and Diabetes Risk (LEADER) Study

  • Kamlesh Khunti

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 22-28 Princess Road West, Leicester LE1 6TP, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 0116 2525445; fax: +44 0116 2525413.
  • ,
  • Nick Taub

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 22-28 Princess Road West, Leicester LE1 6TP, UK
  • ,
  • Jennifer Tringham

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University Hospitals of Leicester, UK
  • ,
  • Janet Jarvis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Diabetes, Diabetes Research Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
  • ,
  • Azhar Farooqi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 22-28 Princess Road West, Leicester LE1 6TP, UK
  • ,
  • T. Chas Skinner

      Affiliations

    • Department of Diabetes, Diabetes Research Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
  • ,
  • Melanie J. Davies

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University Hospitals of Leicester, UK

Received 2 March 2009; received in revised form 15 October 2009; accepted 8 January 2010. published online 04 February 2010.

Abstract 

Aims

To estimate the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in a general population sample of south Asians and white Europeans and compare predictors of metabolic syndrome, using ethnic specific definitions of obesity.

Methods

3099 participants (71.4% white European, 28.6% south Asian) aged 40–75 years were screened using a 75g oral glucose tolerance test. Metabolic syndrome was defined using National Cholesterol Education Programme and International Diabetes Federation definitions. We compared sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve of waist circumference, body mass index and waist–hip ratio.

Results

The prevalence of metabolic syndrome using the definitions above was 29.9% (29.2% south Asian, 30.2% white European), and 34.4% (34.2% south Asian, 34.5% white European), respectively. Using the National Cholesterol Education Programme definition, waist circumference was significantly more predictive of metabolic syndrome than body mass index or waist–hip ratio. The area under the curve for waist circumference was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.69–0.80) and 0.76 (0.72–0.81) for south Asian men and women; 0.83 (0.80–0.85) and 0.80 (0.77–0.82) for white European men and women.

Conclusions

The prevalence of metabolic syndrome is high in both south Asian and white European populations. Waist circumference is a simple and effective measure for predicting metabolic syndrome in different populations.

Abbreviations: MS, metabolic syndrome, IDF, International Diabetes Federation, BMI, body mass index, CVD, cardiovascular disease, WC, waist circumference, IFG, impaired fasting glucose, IGT, impaired glucose tolerance, OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test, NCEP, National Cholesterol Education Programme, ROC, receiver operating characteristics, AUC, area under the curve, WHR, waist–hip ratio

Keywords: Metabolic syndrome, Screening, Anthropometry, Ethnicity, Waist circumference

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1751-9918(10)00003-3

doi:10.1016/j.pcd.2010.01.002

Primary Care Diabetes
Volume 4, Issue 1 , Pages 25-32, April 2010