Complexity of ambulatory care visits of patients with diabetes as reflected by diagnoses per visit

Published:January 12, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2015.11.006

      Highlights

      • Physician type and the number of diagnoses reported are identified.
      • 80% of visits to subspecialist physicians involved care for a single diagnosis.
      • 55% of visits to primary care involved care for at least one additional diagnosis.
      • 70% of visits with one diagnosis reported were to subspecialist physicians.
      • 90% of visits with four diagnoses reported were to primary care physicians.

      Abstract

      Aims

      As the proportion of people with multiple chronic conditions grows, so does the complexity of patient care. Although office-based visits to subspecialists are expected to be intense, due to the focused nature of the visit, the complexity of office-based visits to primary care physicians has yet to be explored in depth. To explore complexity, we looked at diabetes as a case study to determine whether and how the complexity of office-based visits varies by physician specialty type, as measured by the number of diagnoses reported per visits.

      Methods

      The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data is used to create a nationally-representative sample of adults who self-report a diabetes diagnosis, the specialty of the treating physician for their care, and the number of diagnoses for each visit. Using cross tabulations, the distribution of office-based visits are analyzed based on a categorization of patients by number of visit diagnoses, number of conditions reported, and type of physician seen.

      Results

      Almost 80 percent of visits made by adults with diabetes to subspecialist involved care for that single diagnosis; while 55 percent of visits to primary care involved care for at least one additional diagnosis. Almost 70 percent of visits in which only one diagnosis was reported were to subspecialist physicians. Almost 90 percent of visits in which four diagnoses were reported were to primary care physicians.

      Conclusions

      Office-based visits to primary care physicians are made increasingly complex by growing population morbidity. Adults with diabetes report more conditions being cared for per visit with primary care physicians than with subspecialty physicians. Future studies into where our results hold for other chronic conditions would be beneficial. As recent United States legislation moves health care payment toward paying for value and population health, encounter complexity should be accommodated.

      Abbreviations:

      MEPS (Medical Expenditure Panel Survey), ICD-9 (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision)

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      Subscribe to Primary Care Diabetes
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Fried V.M.
        • Bernstein A.B.
        • Bush M.A.
        Multiple Chronic Conditions Among Adults Aged 45 and Over: Trends Over the Past 10 Years. NCHS Data Brief No. 100.
        2012 (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db100.pdf (assessed 22.06.14))
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
        National Diabetes Statistics Report.
        2014 (http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/statsreport14/national-diabetes-report-web.pdf (Accessed 29.09.15))
        • Starfield B.
        • Shi L.
        • Macinko J.
        Contribution of primary care to health systems and health.
        Milbank Q. 2005; 83: 457-502
        • Chernew M.
        • Sabik L.
        • Chandra A.
        • Newhouse J.P.
        Would having more primary care doctors cut health spending growth?.
        Health Aff. (Millwood). 2009; 28: 1327-1335
        • Macinko J.
        • Starfield B.
        • Shi L.
        Quantifying the health benefits of primary care physicians supply in the US.
        Int. J. Health Serv. Res. 2007; 37: 111-126
        • Peterson L.E.
        • Blackburn B.
        • Peabody M.
        • O’Neill T.R.
        Family physicians’ scope of practice and American Board of Family Medicine recertification examination performance.
        J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 2015; 28: 265-270
        • Tu H.T.
        • Ginsburg P.B.
        Losing Ground: Physician Income, 1995–2003. Center for Studying Health System Change Tracking Report No. 15.
        2006
      1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).

        • Goodman R.A.
        • Samuel F.P.
        • Huang E.S.
        • et al.
        Defining and measuring chronic conditions: imperatives for research, policy, program, and practice.
        Prev. Chronic Dis. 2013; 10: 120239
        • Bazemore A.
        • et al.
        What services do family physicians provide in a time of primary care transition.
        JABFM. 2011; 24: 635-636
        • Katerndahl D.
        • Wood R.
        • Jaén C.R.
        Family medicine outpatient encounters are more complex than those of cardiology and psychiatry.
        JABFM. 2011; 24: 6-15
        • Greenwald H.P.
        • Peterson M.L.
        • Garrison L.P.
        • et al.
        Interspecialty variation in office-based care.
        Med. Care. 1984; 22: 14-29
        • Temte J.
        • Grasmick M.
        • Barr J.
        • et al.
        Encounter problem density in primary care: a better measure of complexity?.
        in: Presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American Primary Care Research Group, Vancouver, British Columbia (October 20–23, 2007)2007
        • Starfield B.
        • Lemke K.W.
        • Herbert R.
        • et al.
        Cormorbidity and the use of primary care and specialist care in the elderly.
        Ann. Fam. Med. 2005; 3: 215-222