- •Disease-specific support from peers have improved diabetes self-management outcomes.
- •Peer support is important for low-income population with poorly controlled diabetes.
- •Peer coaching improves HbA1c levels, quality of life, self-efficacy & diabetes distress.
- •Community based peer-led interventions are more efficient for diabetes management.
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
WHO, Global report on diabetes. 2017 [cited 2020 29 August]; Available from: 〈https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565257〉.
IDF, Diabetes around the world in 2021. 2021 [cited 2021 9 December]; Available from: 〈https://diabetesatlas.org/〉.
WHO. Diabetes- Key facts 2021 [cited 2021 29 August 2021]; Available from: 〈https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diabetes〉.
- Spanish diabetes self-management with and without automated telephone reinforcement: two randomized trials.Diabetes Care. 2008; 31: 408-414
WHO, Noncommunicable diseases: Progress monitor, 2020 [cited 2021 30 August]; Available from: 〈https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/ncd-progress-monitor-2020〉.
- Genetic and environmental factors associated with type 2 diabetes and diabetic vascular complications.Rev. Diabet. Stud.: RDS. 2012; 9: 6
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity in sub‐Saharan Africa.Diabetes/Metab. Res. Rev. 2010; 26: 433-445
- A solution might be within people with diabetes themselves.Fam. Pract. 2010; 27: i1-i2
- The case for diabetes population health improvement: evidence-based programming for population outcomes in diabetes.Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2017; 17: 1-17
- The influence of social support on chronic illness self-management: a review and directions for research.Health Educ. Behav. 2003; 30: 170-195
- Diabetes control with reciprocal peer support versus nurse care management: a randomized trial.Ann. Intern. Med. 2010; 153: 507-515
- Patient activation and Type 2 diabetes mellitus self-management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Aust. J. Prim. Health. 2021; 26: 431-442
- Effectiveness of health literacy-and patient activation-targeted interventions on chronic disease self-management outcomes in outpatient settings: a systematic review.Aust. J. Prim. Health. 2022;
- Association of health literacy and diabetes self-management: a systematic review.Aust. J. Prim. Health. 2020; 25: 526-533
- Nurse–community health worker team improves diabetes care in American Samoa: results of a randomized controlled trial.Diabetes Care. 2013; 36: 1947-1953
- Impact of telehealth care among adults living with type 2 diabetes in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021; 18: 12171
- The impact of structured physical activity on glycaemic control in diabetes prevention programmes: a systematic review.Proc. Singap. Healthc. 2018; 27: 193-204
- Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.N. Engl. J. Med. 2003; 348: 383-393
- Self‐management education programmes by lay leaders for people with chronic conditions.Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2007;
- Community health workers in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: an overview of their history, recent evolution, and current effectiveness.Annu. Rev. Public Health. 2014; 35: 399-421
- The effectiveness of patient activation intervention on type 2 diabetes mellitus glycemic control and self-management behaviors: A systematic review of RCTs.Prim. care Diabetes. 2020; 14: 12-20
Ansari, R.M., et al., A Quantitative Research on Self-management of Type 2 Diabetes, 2017.
- Community health workers: part of the solution.Health Aff. 2010; 29: 1338-1342
- Implementation of chronic care model for diabetes self-management: a quantitative analysis.Diabetology. 2022; 3: 407-422
- Peers for progress: promoting peer support for health around the world.Fam. Pract. 2010; 27: i62-i68
- Training peers to provide ongoing diabetes self-management support (DSMS): results from a pilot study.Patient Educ. Couns. 2011; 85: 160-168
- The health care home model: primary health care meeting public health goals.Am. J. Public Health. 2012; 102: 1096-1103
- Association of health literacy with type 2 diabetes mellitus self-management and clinical outcomes within the primary care setting of Iran.Aust. J. Prim. Health. 2018; 24: 162-170
- 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group.Spine. 2009; 34: 1929-1941
- Testing a workplace physical activity intervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial.Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2011; 8: 1-12
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.PLoS Med. 2009; 6e1000097
- Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.John Wiley & Sons,, 2019
- A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of smart-learning.BMJ. 2003; 327: 557-560
- Structured peer-led diabetes self-management and support in a low-income country: The ST2EP randomised controlled trial in Mali.PLoS One. 2018; 13e0191262
- Impact of peer health coaching on glycemic control in low-income patients with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.Ann. Fam. Med. 2013; 11: 137-144
- Community-based peer-led diabetes self-management.Diabetes Educ. 2009; 35: 641-651
- Peer support for patients with type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial.Bmj. 2011; : 342
- Can peer educators influence healthy eating in people with diabetes? Results of a randomized controlled trial.Diabet. Med. 2009; 26: 1048-1054
- Comparative effectiveness of peer leaders and community health workers in diabetes self-management support: results of a randomized controlled trial.Diabetes Care. 2014; 37: 1525-1534
- Peer coach delivered storytelling program improved diabetes medication adherence: A cluster randomized trial.Contemp. Clin. Trials. 2021; 104106358
- Peer-led diabetes education programs in high-risk Mexican Americans improve glycemic control compared with standard approaches: a Project Dulce promotora randomized trial.Diabetes Care. 2011; 34: 1926-1931
- Peer coaches to improve diabetes outcomes in rural Alabama: a cluster randomized trial.Ann. Fam. Med. 2015; 13: S18-S26
- Peer-delivered cognitive behavioral training to improve functioning in patients with diabetes: a cluster-randomized trial.Ann. Fam. Med. 2020; 18: 15-23
- Effect of peer mentors in diabetes self-management vs usual care on outcomes in US veterans with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial.JAMA Netw. Open. 2020; 3 (e2016369-e2016369)
- Peer mentoring and financial incentives to improve glucose control in African American veterans: a randomized trial.Ann. Intern. Med. 2012; 156: 416-424
- Effectiveness of peer‐led self‐management coaching for patients recently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care: A randomized controlled trial.Diabet. Med. 2012; 29: e390-e397
- The effectiveness of a peer coaching education on control and management of type 2 diabetes in women: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Int. J. Community Based Nurs. Midwifery. 2017; 5: 153
- Peer coaching to improve diabetes self-management: which patients benefit most?.J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2013; 28: 938-942
- The role of peer support education model in Management of Glucose and Lipid Levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Chinese adults.J. Diabetes Res. 2019; (2019)
- The effectiveness of peer health coaching in improving glycemic control among low-income patients with diabetes: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.BMC Public Health. 2011; 11: 1-6
- Diabetes peer coaching: do “better patients” make better coaches?.Diabetes Educ. 2014; 40: 107-115
- Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.Diabetes Care. 2015; 38: 140-149
- The role and effectiveness of telephone peer coaching for adult patients with type 2 diabetes.Can. J. Diabetes. 2019; 43: 399-405
WHO, Hypertension, 2021 [cited 2021 28 August]; Available from: 〈https://www.who.int/health-topics/hypertension#tab=tab_1〉.
Healthline, Cholesterol Levels: By age, LDL, HDL, and More, 2021 [cited 2021 28 August]; Available from: 〈https://www.healthline.com/health/high-cholesterol/levels-by-age〉.
AusGovt. Body mass index (BMI) | Healthy Weight Guide, 2021 [cited 2021 28 August]; Available from: 〈https://healthyweight.health.gov.au/wps/portal/Home/get-started/are-you-a-healthy-weight/bmi/〉.
- Effectiveness and applicability of self-management peer coaching in the continuity of diabetes care.Am. Diabetes Assoc. 2018;
- Peer-based behavioural strategies to improve chronic disease self-management and clinical outcomes: evidence, logistics, evaluation considerations and needs for future research.Fam. Pract. 2010; 27: i17-i22
- Self-management and patient activation in COPD patients: an evidence summary of randomized controlled trials.Clin. Epidemiol. Glob. Health. 2018; 6: 148-154
Ansari, R.M., H. Hosseinzadeh, and N.A. Zwar, Primary healthcare system of Pakistan: challenges to self-management of type 2 diabetes, 2016.
- The impact of a face-to-face peer-support intervention on adults with type 2 diabetes: a cluster-randomised trial.J. Endocrinol., Metab. Diabetes South Afr. 2021; 26: 34-39
Orem, D., S. Taylor, and K. Renpenning, Nursing Concep Prac, 2001.
IDF, Peer Leader Manual, 2022 [cited 2022 21 Jul 2022]; Available from: 〈https://www.idf.org/component/attachments/attachments.html?id=710&task=download〉.
- Supported self-management for people with type 2 diabetes: a meta-review of quantitative systematic reviews.BMJ Open. 2018; 8e024262
- Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control.Diabetes care. 2002; 25: 1159-1171
- Diabetes in older adults.Diabetes Care. 2012; 35: 2650-2664
- Diabetes and hypertension: a position statement by the American Diabetes Association.Diabetes Care. 2017; 40: 1273-1284